Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
160 bytes added ,  02:12, February 13, 2009
Line 107: Line 107:     
Rather than dump the entirety of the quackwatch medical database on chiropractic here, I will instead provide a link [http://www.chirobase.org/].  The main reason to list chiropractic in the page on pseudoscience is because its main tenant, that of spinal subluxation, is demonstrable false. The process of cracking the lower back of a person is effective for removing lower back pain, but chiropractic can actually be dangerous when applied to the neck area. [[User:ArnoldFriend|ArnoldFriend]] 20:35, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 
Rather than dump the entirety of the quackwatch medical database on chiropractic here, I will instead provide a link [http://www.chirobase.org/].  The main reason to list chiropractic in the page on pseudoscience is because its main tenant, that of spinal subluxation, is demonstrable false. The process of cracking the lower back of a person is effective for removing lower back pain, but chiropractic can actually be dangerous when applied to the neck area. [[User:ArnoldFriend|ArnoldFriend]] 20:35, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 +
::::Where is the comparison to risks of chiro vs. allopathic medicine when it comes to necks?  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 21:12, 12 February 2009 (EST)
    
== String Theory ==
 
== String Theory ==
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910

edits

Navigation menu