Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness (view source)

Revision as of 19:13, February 14, 2009

548 bytes added ,  19:13, February 14, 2009
→‎The gravity question: reply to an interesting comment
Line 156: Line 156:     
Open mindedness is all well and good, but I feel this question overreaches a bit, considering the fact that this proportionality holds definitively that the exponent is exactly 2.
 
Open mindedness is all well and good, but I feel this question overreaches a bit, considering the fact that this proportionality holds definitively that the exponent is exactly 2.
 +
 +
: Thanks for your comment, but your remarks serve to illustrate how this question exposes close-mindedness.  Gravity is a physical phenomenon.  It's observed, not derived.  Many people are trained (by atheists) to think that physics ''must'' be a certain way, rather than observing with an open mind what it actually is.  Those who insist that physics must conform to mathematical expectations are ... unjustifiably closed-minded.
 +
 +
: Open your mind and you'll never want to go back.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:13, 14 February 2009 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/624007"

Navigation menu