1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 08:46, March 24, 2007
, 08:46, March 24, 2007no edit summary
[[Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive1]]
[[Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive1]]
[[Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive2]]
[[Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive2]]
==Unfair Bias at Conservapedia==
I'm an American and a Conservative, and although I have realized that articles that are subject to heavy debate have a hard time being totally unbiased, a lot of what Conservapedia says about them is totally unfair, and very biased.
An article with noticeable bias at Wikipedia is the article on [[Intelligent Design]], other ones, especially with reference to politics or religion tend to have some bias as well, even if it's hidden a bit more. In a lot of ways that makes sense-considering that biased people wrote it it's basically impossible to have an article without bias. [[Conservapedia]] doesn't even try.
The articles that Conservapedia does complain about are for the most part very small things, mostly things that aren't even there anymore--in a free open content, wiki dictionary like Wikipedia mistakes can be made by anybody, and corrected by anybody, a system that works very well--as can be seen by Conservapedia copying that system.
==The center of the world==
==The center of the world==