Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
464 bytes added ,  14:50, February 15, 2009
reply
Line 254: Line 254:  
:::: Someone's fame is very relevant for an encyclopaedia; without it, they don't get to ''be in'' an encyclopaedia!
 
:::: Someone's fame is very relevant for an encyclopaedia; without it, they don't get to ''be in'' an encyclopaedia!
 
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:13, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:13, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::::: OK, but burying something further down in an entry has the same effect as removal with respect to many visitors.
 +
 +
::::: I appreciate your humor about "fame". but perhaps it's worth adding that I don't agree with it.  Jesus had very little fame, and the same could be about many other important entries in a good encyclopedia.  Speculation about fame is even less encyclopedic (or meaningful).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:50, 15 February 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,964

edits

Navigation menu