nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
11,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: +
Talk:Immanuel Velikovsky (view source)
Revision as of 15:59, February 15, 2009
, 15:59, February 15, 2009→Category:Authors: need more subcats
::::I'd say that "Authors" is a good top-level category for all authors regardless of level of success. Included amongst its subcategory could be "Great Writers of World Literature". A problem I see, however, is edit or talk page warring about who fits in said subcategory. [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 10:57, 15 February 2009 (EST)
::::I'd say that "Authors" is a good top-level category for all authors regardless of level of success. Included amongst its subcategory could be "Great Writers of World Literature". A problem I see, however, is edit or talk page warring about who fits in said subcategory. [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 10:57, 15 February 2009 (EST)
My suggestion would be to subdivide the "Authors" category into either genres or eras, because as it stands, that category has 3 subcategories and 396 articles. I personally agree that V merits being listed amongst the authors, but we're going to have to do some work in subcategorizing the authors category. [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 10:53, 15 February 2009 (EST)
My suggestion would be to subdivide the "Authors" category into either genres or eras, because as it stands, that category has 3 subcategories and 396 articles. I personally agree that V merits being listed amongst the authors, but we're going to have to do some work in subcategorizing the authors category. [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 10:53, 15 February 2009 (EST)
:I agree with the need for more subcats. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:59, 15 February 2009 (EST)
==Category:science fiction==
==Category:science fiction==