nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Talk:Immanuel Velikovsky (view source)
Revision as of 19:55, February 15, 2009
, 19:55, February 15, 2009→Category:science fiction: Agreed, but back to front.
:I think there are two issues here (1) Was the book "sold to the science fiction audience" (2) Even if it was, is the science fiction category justified based on the ''audience''? After all, the book was read by numerous scientists that criticized it; do we add the "science/scientist" cagegory? --[[User:Eric2009|Eric2009]] 09:59, 15 February 2009 (EST)
:I think there are two issues here (1) Was the book "sold to the science fiction audience" (2) Even if it was, is the science fiction category justified based on the ''audience''? After all, the book was read by numerous scientists that criticized it; do we add the "science/scientist" cagegory? --[[User:Eric2009|Eric2009]] 09:59, 15 February 2009 (EST)
:: Agreed, except that you have the questions back to front in the sense that No. 2 needs to be answered first, and No. 1 only needs to be answered if No. 2 is answered in the positive. Personally, I think it should be answered in the negative. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 14:55, 15 February 2009 (EST)