nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: + +
Talk:Immanuel Velikovsky (view source)
Revision as of 04:08, February 16, 2009
, 04:08, February 16, 2009→Religious Creationists
: My guess for the ratinoale of the Creationism category is that creationists are mentioned in the article. Not a good reason for inclusion, in my opinion, though.
: My guess for the ratinoale of the Creationism category is that creationists are mentioned in the article. Not a good reason for inclusion, in my opinion, though.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:31, 15 February 2009 (EST)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:31, 15 February 2009 (EST)
::I agree with PJR here. A mere mention isn't substantive enough to merit applying a whole category. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:08, 15 February 2009 (EST)