17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: +
Talk:Immanuel Velikovsky (view source)
Revision as of 09:53, February 16, 2009
, 09:53, February 16, 2009whu V is not accepted by any creationists
: So why did you revert to "''Religious'' Creationists"?
: So why did you revert to "''Religious'' Creationists"?
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:34, 16 February 2009 (EST)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:34, 16 February 2009 (EST)
::It's true that V and the creationists overlap on a few points, but when deYoung says that V endorses evolution and rejects the Bible, Christianity and miracles, it's pretty hard for a creationist to buy into his very complex theory, and not one does so. V's goal was to show many of the miracles of the Bible had physical causes and were not divine miracles. Stansfield looked and found not a single creationist supporter. Send your email address to me at rjensen@uic.edu and I will send along the whole Stansfield article.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 04:53, 16 February 2009 (EST)