17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: +
Talk:Immanuel Velikovsky (view source)
Revision as of 13:10, February 16, 2009
, 13:10, February 16, 2009ICR says no support
I don't think it is a matter of all or nothing, Eric. One can accept parts of what a person says, and it does not logically follow that doing that means an endorsement of everything that person has ever said, right? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 08:06, 16 February 2009 (EST)
I don't think it is a matter of all or nothing, Eric. One can accept parts of what a person says, and it does not logically follow that doing that means an endorsement of everything that person has ever said, right? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 08:06, 16 February 2009 (EST)
:::::::Stansfield systematically looked at how creationists used V. he discovered they ignored it. He contacted ICR, asking "How was his work received by various groups within the creationist community outside the ICR?" answer: Some writers have mentioned his ideas but we are '''not aware of any following in support of Velikovsky's theories''' on celestial collisions." [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 08:10, 16 February 2009 (EST)