Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,380 bytes added ,  14:45, February 16, 2009
Line 162: Line 162:     
Then you should get rid of this satirical cartoon and replace it with a more appropriate picture.  It is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  --[[User:Yorpa|Yorpa]] 09:40, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 
Then you should get rid of this satirical cartoon and replace it with a more appropriate picture.  It is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  --[[User:Yorpa|Yorpa]] 09:40, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
== Please tell me this is meant to be a joke ==
 +
 +
''a liberal is merely someone who craves attention''
 +
<br />Erm... there's just a little problem with what you're saying here. I don't think that this is factually correct, especially considering the fact that Conservatives are just as vocal about their opinions as Liberals are. Perhaps we could consider removing this phrase as it makes the entire article sound ridiculously biased. I know that it is meant to be anti-Liberal, but could we please steer away from what sounds like a petty insult? It makes it sound like vandalism.
 +
 +
There are a few other bits throughout the article which make it sound like whoever wrote the article didn't know what they were talking about/were trying desperately to elongate or pad out the article, eg ''Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of fascism''. Liberalism and fascism are polar opposites, one pushing for equality, freedom of choice and help for the poor, the other pushing for a superior race of people, a forced way of living and murdering the poor. I propose that this statement could be amended or removed, especially seeing as it says ''some argue'' rather than ''most'' or ''a significant number of the scientific community/economic experts''. We should not base arguments on what one or two people think - that is not reliable information.
28

edits

Navigation menu