Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes added ,  17:32, February 16, 2009
m
link to de-orphan
Line 1: Line 1: −
The '''standard of care''' is a legal concept used in the [[tort]] of [[negligence]].  To make out the tort one must establish: (1) that a duty of care owed by the [[defendant]] to the [[plaintiff]]; (2) the relevant standard of care relating to that duty; (3) that there has been a breach of the duty by the defendant; and (4) that the plaintiff has suffered damage as a result of the breach.
+
The '''standard of care''' is a legal concept used in the [[tort]] of [[negligence]].  To make out the tort one must establish: (1) that a [[duty of care]] owed by the [[defendant]] to the [[plaintiff]]; (2) the relevant standard of care relating to that duty; (3) that there has been a breach of the duty by the defendant; and (4) that the plaintiff has suffered damage as a result of the breach.
    
An example of the standard of care might be the level of treatment that a [[physician]] employs in treating a [[patient]].  If the care provided by the physician falls below the standard determined by the court and the patient suffers injury as a result, then the patient can sue for negligence.  In ''Vaughn v. Menlove'' <ref>(1837) 3 Bing. N.C. 468, 132 E.R. 490.</ref> the standard of care is defined as whether the individual "proceed[ed] with such reasonable caution as a prudent man would have exercised under such circumstances".
 
An example of the standard of care might be the level of treatment that a [[physician]] employs in treating a [[patient]].  If the care provided by the physician falls below the standard determined by the court and the patient suffers injury as a result, then the patient can sue for negligence.  In ''Vaughn v. Menlove'' <ref>(1837) 3 Bing. N.C. 468, 132 E.R. 490.</ref> the standard of care is defined as whether the individual "proceed[ed] with such reasonable caution as a prudent man would have exercised under such circumstances".
Block, SkipCaptcha
8,517

edits

Navigation menu