Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + +
no edit summary
The NCSE claims that the list is a "tongue-in-cheek" response to [[creationist]] and [[intelligent design]] lists which "try to convince the public that evolution is somehow being rejected by scientists".<ref>National Center for Science Education (NSCE), ''Project Steve'' [http://ncseweb.org/taking-action/project-steve] (NSCE)</ref>
The NCSE claims that the list is a "tongue-in-cheek" response to [[creationist]] and [[intelligent design]] lists which "try to convince the public that evolution is somehow being rejected by scientists".<ref>National Center for Science Education (NSCE), ''Project Steve'' [http://ncseweb.org/taking-action/project-steve] (NSCE)</ref>
However, such lists are actually rebuttals to earlier ''argument ad populum'' evolutionist claims that all scientists accept evolution, or that creationists don't have scientific qualifications.
However, such lists are actually rebuttals to earlier ''argument ad populum'' evolutionist claims that all scientists accept evolution, or that creationists don't have scientific qualifications.
It is believed Project Steve was crafted as a response to Intelligent Design, traditional marriage and those who promote the slogan “God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.” <ref>[http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/california_global_warming/2009/02/14/182040.html California Weather Exposes Fiction of Global Warming] NewsMax, February 14, 2009</ref>
== References ==
== References ==