1,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Is the theory of macroevolution true? (view source)
Revision as of 04:29, December 18, 2006
, 04:29, December 18, 2006No
>95% of academic biologists support it.
>95% of academic biologists support it.
: '''Reply''': What evidence do you have to support this statement? I have often wondered if there was a place were one could view this sort of information. It would be most helpful. Thanks! [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 23:29, 17 December 2006 (EST)
Those who argue against it have a poor understanding of biology.
Those who argue against it have a poor understanding of biology.
: '''Reply''': Again, what evidence do you have to support this statement? Here are some creation biologists, to name a few:
* Dr. Raymond G. Bohlin, Biologist
* Dr. Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology
* Prof. Chung-Il Cho, Biology Education
* Dr. Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist
* Dr. David A. DeWitt, Biology, Biochemistry, Neuroscience
* Dr. Dudley Eirich, Molecular Biologist
* Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology
* Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology
* Dr. Duane Gish, Biochemist
* Dr. D.B. Gower, Biochemistry
* Dr. Bob Hosken, Biochemistry
All of them have doctors degrees in some sort of biology and all argue against macro-evolution and for creationism. Are you claiming that all of them have a poor understanding of biology? [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 23:29, 17 December 2006 (EST)
==no...==
==no...==