Changes

The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is promoted by the Free Software Foundation, Inc. as a way supposedly to facilitate the free use and modification of textual information.<ref>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt</ref>  It is modeled after the approach taken by free software developers to encourage improvements and use of free software, despite fundamental differences between editing and using text rather than software.  But in fact its red tape and tricky restrictions have limited its usefulness.

The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is promoted by the Free Software Foundation, Inc. as a way supposedly to facilitate the free use and modification of textual information.<ref>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt</ref>  It is modeled after the approach taken by free software developers to encourage improvements and use of free software, despite fundamental differences between editing and using text rather than software.  But in fact its red tape and tricky restrictions have limited its usefulness.

The GFDL license is complex and burdensome, and difficult for teachers to use.  It is rare to see a book or educational material that is based on reuse of material provided under this license.

The GFDL license is complex and burdensome, and difficult for teachers to use.

* '''''Every''''' person who has worked on the text must be credited whenever it is published.  There are several obvious problems with this:

*# It can obviously lead to '''huge''' lists of authors being included with every copy of the document, even if they only made minor changes (spelling, punctuation etc).

*# Traditionally published books give clear and simple credit to the main author(s).  GFDL documents don't

* '''''Every''''' change must be logged, no matter how trivial.  A situation could easily result, where a short document is accompanied by hundreds of pages of "change logs".

* All derivative works are '''''forced''''' to use the GFDL.  This obviously cripples the chances of small organisations (schools, church groups etc...) protecting their intellectual property under copyright law if they choose to incorporate GFDL material in their work.

[[Conservapedia]] has rejected the GFDL as unnecessarily complex and too restrictive.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Copyright</ref>

It is rare to see a book or educational material that is based on reuse of material provided under this license.  [[Conservapedia]] has rejected the GFDL as unnecessarily complex and too restrictive.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Copyright</ref>

== References ==

== References ==