5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 670:
Line 670: + + +
no edit summary
I previously commented on this section of the article and I think TK did amend it, but both must have been lost with the recent crash. This section is poorly construction and too opinionated, and needs a lot of work. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:44, 15 February 2009 (EST)
I previously commented on this section of the article and I think TK did amend it, but both must have been lost with the recent crash. This section is poorly construction and too opinionated, and needs a lot of work. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:44, 15 February 2009 (EST)
== Privacy Rights Section ==
Is there any chance an explanation could be given for the removal of the Privacy Rights section? TK posted a threat on my talk page not to post 'liberal deceit' or I wouldn't be taken seriously. I was under the impression that the ACLU did do the three things indicated in the offending section. If there is any information that would indicate they did not support 'Joe the Plumber' with an open letter, file a friend of the court brief in support of Limbaugh, or join a broad coalition of civil rights groups to oppose the national ID card, please let me know or post it in the article. I thought the references provided were of the required quality, or is Fox News a source of 'liberal deceit'? --[[User:JohnnyBB|JohnnyBB]] 13:58, 18 February 2009 (EST)