Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 111: Line 111:     
We also have to look into how our lectures align with the standards, which are linked to at the top of the page. As part of that, my guess is that creationist content in the world history lec. 1 would not be considered acceptable. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 14:55, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 
We also have to look into how our lectures align with the standards, which are linked to at the top of the page. As part of that, my guess is that creationist content in the world history lec. 1 would not be considered acceptable. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 14:55, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
: The lectures are factual so I don't see a problem there, unless there is something in the state standards that says that a teacher must deny facts!  Please feel free to check the state standards.
 +
 +
: As to fingerprinting of employees, are you saying it is required?  That's an expensive hassle.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits

Navigation menu