679
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 218:
Line 218: + + +
→"Criticism" Section
*Well, I can't see a reason to have a section to critique the rest of the pages content. That is why we have this Talk section. Please feel free to make your own sub-header here, for any comments on the content. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 11:24, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
*Well, I can't see a reason to have a section to critique the rest of the pages content. That is why we have this Talk section. Please feel free to make your own sub-header here, for any comments on the content. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 11:24, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
The purpose of the separate "criticism" sections in most articles seems to be to trivialie content unflattering to someone the conservapedian likes into a separate section. To get an idea of how it works, imagine having an article on Hitler that touts his anti-Communism, his hatred of homosexuals, his rolling back of women's rights, his amazing high-way program, etc., then having a section marked "Criticism" which begins with "Hitler's opponents maintain that he murdered several million people..."
--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 12:42, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
== Roehm and Hitler ==
== Roehm and Hitler ==