679
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 553:
Line 553: + +
→Cropped section placed here for discussion
Given the amount of innuendo I've found in the article devoted to Hillary Clinton -- "Hillary Clinton's best friend Eric Bauman supervised the defense of the litigation, but died under SUSPICIOUS mysterious circumstances at the height of the controversy; the death was officially ruled a suicide," why do you object to the inclusion of the FACT that Ray Kaplan's suicide was the result of being called before the McCarthy Committee? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 10:58, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
Given the amount of innuendo I've found in the article devoted to Hillary Clinton -- "Hillary Clinton's best friend Eric Bauman supervised the defense of the litigation, but died under SUSPICIOUS mysterious circumstances at the height of the controversy; the death was officially ruled a suicide," why do you object to the inclusion of the FACT that Ray Kaplan's suicide was the result of being called before the McCarthy Committee? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 10:58, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
This excision of details surrounding McCarthy's behavior qualifies as the deliberate omission of FACTS, which is an interesting approach to a website supposed to be an educational resource. Is the intent here to impart information -- or carefully vet it so that people like Joseph McCarthy are flattered and people like Hillary Clinton, etc. are villified? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 13:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)