Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Antarctica (view source)

Revision as of 20:33, February 20, 2009

178 bytes added ,  20:33, February 20, 2009
reversion explained
Line 8: Line 8:     
Worse, it ignores the fact that [[correlation is not causation]] to imply that gases drive temperature. I hear it's actually the other way around. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:25, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 
Worse, it ignores the fact that [[correlation is not causation]] to imply that gases drive temperature. I hear it's actually the other way around. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:25, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
== Reversion ==
 +
 +
"New Scientist" is a liberal rag.  It takes more support than that to make a far-fetched claim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:33, 20 February 2009 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,552

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/628126"

Navigation menu