6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Archive: [[User talk:MountainDewarchive1]]+ − − == [[User:Conservator]] == − − I can't tell what he's doing. He seems to be adding extra-huge amounts of content to articles, but every time I try and go there, it errors out. Just fyi. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 16:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT) − − == Anarchocapitalism == − − The user created a redirect to that page at Free Market, and it looked like a crank article.[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 02:54, 20 March 2007 (EDT) − :Sorry for any time that I wasted. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 02:58, 20 March 2007 (EDT) − − ==[[God]]== − I unlocked [[God]] to registered users since around 8 days have passed since it was locked. Probably a good idea to keep an eye on it, so I thought I'd let you know. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 18:36, 20 March 2007 (EDT) − − ==[[User:Conservative]]== − The debate over [[User:Conservative]] is going on at [[Talk:dinosaur]], and the section above the one you just created at [[User Talk:Aschlafly]]. I must agree, it is somewhat disturbing that the notion "Conservative's worldview is the ONLY worldview" has gained acceptance. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 18:37, 20 March 2007 (EDT) − − == New User == − The New User log has been installed. You can see new account creations now. Thanks for the tip! [[User:Conservapedia Webmaster|Conservapedia Webmaster]] 09:28, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − − − ===Judaism== − − You have to revert that page to an older version, ASAP. There is slander in there I think you missed - like saying that the real Jews are white Europeans and that Jews descended from Satan.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:46, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − − == Judaism -- the version you have protected is the wrong one == − − Hi MountainDew -- a note to let you know that the version of [[Judaism]] which you protected is an innacurate one, filled to rants by someone who subscribes to the widely discredited [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Identity Christian Identity] school of racist thinking which goes so far as to reject the notion that the Jews of today even *are* Jews, and says they are descended from Satan. Please revert to an earlier accurate version if you are going to protect this entry! − − [[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 12:46, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − − ==User names== − − Thanks for that block. If I were an admin, I'd have done the same. Keep up the good work! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:48, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − − == CP:AID == − − Hello, You recently expressed your opinion at [[CP:AID]]. After voting, it has become obvious that the first article to improve is [[Germany]] and any related articles. Details will be posted soon at [[CP:AID]], check there tomorrow for details. Thanks! --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 15:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − − == Unlock == − − Now that the rash of vandalism seems to have passed, could you unlock my user page? I need to make some edits. Thanks. [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 21:04, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − − :Thanks, feel free to delete this little thread. [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 21:06, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − ==Spoon== − why did you block him?? All he did was quote the Bible. If you don't think it belongs where it was put, delete it, but don't block the editor. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 22:04, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − − He was only posting verses that post the Bible in a bad light. I will unblock him, though. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 22:04, 21 March 2007 (EDT) − − User Ilikebigbibles should be blocked. Are you going to be up a while? If not, then I'm inclined to block him now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 02:36, 22 March 2007 (EDT) − − :Thanks much. He's from Australia (near Sydney) based on his IP, and his edits and name highly suggest the need to block. Unless you see a reason not to, I'd recommend blocking before you sign off. Thanks much!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 02:40, 22 March 2007 (EDT) − − ==Alien== − Please explain your justification for deletion of the content i added to [[Alien]]. [[User:Ilikebigbibles|Ilikebigbibles]] 02:43, 22 March 2007 (EDT) − − == confused == − − Tsumetai said to ask someone on the list and you had a cool name, so I'm asking you. What did i do that was vandalism? and what am I a not good parody at? I thought we were supposed to add true things here, not like at Wikipedia were you have to have npov and liberal bias. [[User:Gabriel|Gabriel]] 13:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT) − − == Dispute Resolution Process == − − Erm, not sure if you meant to, but you overwrote my edit [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAschlafly&diff=58850&oldid=58846 here]. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:43, 22 March 2007 (EDT) − − :OK, thanks for the quick response. I was getting worried for a minute. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:48, 22 March 2007 (EDT) − − == Thanks for the quick block == − − Wow, you were really quick on that last block! Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:07, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − − Gah, you're way too quick with these obscenity-laden usernames! Hopefully this message will distract you long enough for me to nab one. Mwuahahahaha! --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:09, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − − == Sockpuppet/Troll Stalker! == − − I know you are the same person as that hoji...you ain't fooling anyone, pinko liberal godless soul! − − *Sorry, Dan...I apologize. I thought you would realize the humor, the joke, being since you were posting on hoji's page too. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 03:17, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − − ==Blocked user== − − I just got an e-mail from AmesG that he was blocked by conservative, he wanted me to ask another admin to look into it. I am not sure the surroundings but there is a decent chance it was pre-mature. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 17:13, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − − : Thank you all again!!!-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:21, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − ::Poor AmesG. You're like the red-headed stepchild of the family. :-p [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 17:27, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − :::Like the gingers from South Park! --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 18:41, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − *ROFL! Cheer up....I haven't banned you yet! :p --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 18:37, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − − : I totally am. But getting banned by Conservative is good for the soul.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 18:39, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − − ::Bans need not be permanent. Does a user block here also stop the user from posting on their own user talk page? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 19:27, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − − *If one is banned, they cannot sign into the site. They could, I guess, post as someone else on their banned page. Perhaps the Webmaster needs to remove the pages of banned users... --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 20:12, 23 March 2007 (EDT) − − == Please Stop Removing Page Protection == − − It is ''especially rude'' for you to unprotect pages, without consultation with the Sysop who locked it. Is there some explanation for doing it, other than just your idea you know better? --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 01:32, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − == BillOReillyFan == − − I'm not sure if this has surfaced in the discussion over [[User:BillOReillyFan]] yet, but [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AConservapedia&diff=117389986&oldid=117378784 this edit] to Wikipedia by somebody who seems to be BillOReillyFan is quite incriminating. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 03:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − :Can't we call him something else, some cool code name? BillOReillyFan...meh....[[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 03:04, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − ::I just say BORF. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:05, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − :::Ha! Thats perfect actually. You are on a roll tonight! [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 03:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − :::Conservapedia Threat number zero-five-two-nine, abberviated at CON-T0529. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 03:05, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − ::::Have fun BORF hunting, I will see you tommorrow! [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 03:15, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − I think [[User:Pacman]] might be a BORF. Lots of good edits (esp. in knowledgeable areas) and then complete silliness. Anyway, he's blocked for a day now. I guess we'll see. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 04:41, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − :If nothing else, he likes the nickname you gave him. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 04:42, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − ==Unblock== − Thanks for the unblock, MountainDew. I had no idea how sneaky people were, what with the edits by "BORF". Thanks for redeeming me. [[User:Vossy|Vossy]] 03:52, 24 March 2007 (EDT) − − − == Scientology == − − Can you provide some justification for your edits on Scientology? I was fixing a rather overzealous edit by a user called Terryeo. − − : I am he. Since the discussion seems to go on at [[User_talk:Pacman#Revert|Pacman's Page]], I replied to him there. The data Pacman is introducing is already in the article. It is in the [[Scientology#Controversy|Contoversy Section]] of the article and has been there for some time. Tmloulouse introduced the data on 19 March at this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientology&oldid=47501 editing difference]. He and I worked out a compromise wording that we could both live with, but he introduced the idea and documented it pretty throughly. Pacman seems to want the data taken out of controversy and put into basic beliefs, which would be incorrect. That's why he and I are working that out. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 13:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
Replacing page with 'Some idiot keeps registering nonsense names about Hitler being a sensitive man. ~~~~'
Some idiot keeps registering nonsense names about Hitler being a sensitive man. [[User:Sensitivity + Man = Hitler|Sensitivity + Man = Hitler]] 14:52, 24 March 2007 (EDT)