4,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 297:
Line 297: − + Line 309:
Line 309: − +
Talk:Tyrannosaurus rex (view source)
Revision as of 16:21, February 23, 2009
, 16:21, February 23, 2009edit old user's sig - there are 31 pages linking to non-existant "request for admin thanks to that
Second, if the flesh was not fossilized why hasn't it been carbon dated? That would settle a few arguments wouldn't it?
Second, if the flesh was not fossilized why hasn't it been carbon dated? That would settle a few arguments wouldn't it?
The whole thing sounds a bit suspicious. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] <sup>[[Conservapedia:Requests_for_adminship#Support_2|Vote Horace for sysop]]</sup> 20:46, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
The whole thing sounds a bit suspicious. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] <sup>Conservapedia:Requests_for_adminship#Support_2|Vote Horace for sysop</sup> 20:46, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
If creationists accepted carbon dating there wouldn't be creationists anymore, don't you think?
If creationists accepted carbon dating there wouldn't be creationists anymore, don't you think?
Give it a read.--[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:04, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Give it a read.--[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:04, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:Well, there you go. I stand corrected. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] <sup>[[Conservapedia:Requests_for_adminship#Support_2|Vote Horace for sysop]]</sup> 21:34, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:Well, there you go. I stand corrected. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] <sup>Conservapedia:Requests_for_adminship#Support_2|Vote Horace for sysop</sup> 21:34, 24 April 2007 (EDT)