4,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − Line 227:
Line 226: − +
User talk:Ed Poor/8 (view source)
Revision as of 17:48, February 23, 2009
, 17:48, February 23, 2009edit old user's sig - there are 31 pages linking to non-existant "request for admin thanks to that)
You want a religion that justifies hate, look at the [[Honor killing]] article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 19:37, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
You want a religion that justifies hate, look at the [[Honor killing]] article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 19:37, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
::: That or, I can recall an event where there was one placed on tons of pages by a brand new account. With the nature of this site, I think they have decided they need to develop trust in a user before they grant them full blown access. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 09:15, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
::: That or, I can recall an event where there was one placed on tons of pages by a brand new account. With the nature of this site, I think they have decided they need to develop trust in a user before they grant them full blown access. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 09:15, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
:::Exactly. The vandals would upload a sickening pic and then start replacing articles with this pic. First, a sysop or editor would have to see the pic(s), the vandal would have to be blocked, then go about deleting the pic and restoring the articles. Even though this image uploading block will not stop all the vandals, it will remove one of their favorite tactics. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</sup> 09:28, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
:::Exactly. The vandals would upload a sickening pic and then start replacing articles with this pic. First, a sysop or editor would have to see the pic(s), the vandal would have to be blocked, then go about deleting the pic and restoring the articles. Even though this image uploading block will not stop all the vandals, it will remove one of their favorite tactics. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA)</sup> 09:28, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
Hmm.. That would do it. In any case I'm still waiting for my account to be given that status. My edits are all well thought out and non-controversial.[[User:Hannibal ad portas|Hannibal ad portas]] 09:20, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
Hmm.. That would do it. In any case I'm still waiting for my account to be given that status. My edits are all well thought out and non-controversial.[[User:Hannibal ad portas|Hannibal ad portas]] 09:20, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
*If I had even one clue, I would tell you. I guess Ed can grant the rights, or Andy, but I don't know how to, or if I can. I posted on Andy's page asking, but no answer. :-( --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 09:47, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
*If I had even one clue, I would tell you. I guess Ed can grant the rights, or Andy, but I don't know how to, or if I can. I posted on Andy's page asking, but no answer. :-( --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 09:47, 30 May 2007 (EDT)