Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:  
::However, while incest forbids sexual union due to closeness of kin, homosex is forbidden due to closeness of kind. While bestiality (which your logic would also allow) is forbidden due to being radically of another species. DNA is specific, but the Creator is even more specific about who are to be sexually joined, and as the article abundant substantiates, the women alone was made for the man, as his uniquely compatible and complementary help meet, in ways that transcend, but do not eliminate, procreational aspects.     
 
::However, while incest forbids sexual union due to closeness of kin, homosex is forbidden due to closeness of kind. While bestiality (which your logic would also allow) is forbidden due to being radically of another species. DNA is specific, but the Creator is even more specific about who are to be sexually joined, and as the article abundant substantiates, the women alone was made for the man, as his uniquely compatible and complementary help meet, in ways that transcend, but do not eliminate, procreational aspects.     
   −
::So, no, i do not agree the Bible was wrong, but that you are wrong. As is your premise and conclusion. Today's morality is not saving lives, but destroying them and society, and costing plenty in souls, lives, and money. http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/RevealingStatistics.html
+
::So, no, i do not agree the Bible was wrong, but that you are wrong. As is your premise and conclusion. Today's morality is not saving lives, but destroying them and society, and costing plenty in souls, lives, and money. http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/RevealingStatistics.html [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 17:58, 23 February 2009 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,414

edits

Navigation menu