444
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 69:
Line 69: +
no edit summary
:::::::I didn't say that ''all'' creatonist approaches did that; indeed, I specifically stated the opposite. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 15:00, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::::I didn't say that ''all'' creatonist approaches did that; indeed, I specifically stated the opposite. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 15:00, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Should there be a mention of "white hole cosmology" in the article as an example of falsifiable creationist science in the article in that case? Would it live?--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 15:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT)