217
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 164:
Line 164: + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 19:18, March 24, 2007
, 19:18, March 24, 2007→Palestinian people on Wikipedia: John 8:45
::Hi Ed! We've never talked, but I know you get great respect over there. The points you cite here are so true. Rather than silence a "sparring partner" we actually can sharpen our own skills and outlook. It's not always a matter of converting another editor, being openminded means an editor should be able to recognize thier own flaws by hearing a well reasoned argument. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:29, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::Hi Ed! We've never talked, but I know you get great respect over there. The points you cite here are so true. Rather than silence a "sparring partner" we actually can sharpen our own skills and outlook. It's not always a matter of converting another editor, being openminded means an editor should be able to recognize thier own flaws by hearing a well reasoned argument. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:29, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:::The Wikipedia article "Palestinian people" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_people] perhaps doesn't mention "terrorism" because the "Palestinian people" aren't "terrorists" per se. That would be like saying an article on the American people is biased because it doesn't mention "mass murderers" because of, for example, "[[Charles Manson]]". If one follows the Wikpedia link to the "Palestine Liberation Organization" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization] it is mentioned that they are thought to be "the richest of all terrorist organizations".
:::One needn't be to be a rocket scientist to notice how silly some of these examples of bias in Wikipedia are.
:::They make us Conservatives look like nutjobs.
::::"And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not." (John 8:45)
:::[[User:JC|JC]] 15:18, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
== The Face of Terror: Basque ETA? ==
== The Face of Terror: Basque ETA? ==