1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 508:
Line 508: + +
→Criticism of McCarthy's methods: VOA investigation was not just about sabotage
Grilling someone about their personal religious beliefs in an investigation that is supposed to be about sabotage is completely irrelevant and inappropriate. And only someone who has not read the actual transcript of the exchange between McCarthy and Welch would claim that "Welch had asked McCarthy to name someone and McCarthy named Fisher because his name and history was already known." In fact, McCarthy had already agreed to NOT mention Fisher in the course of the hearings. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 11:03, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
Grilling someone about their personal religious beliefs in an investigation that is supposed to be about sabotage is completely irrelevant and inappropriate. And only someone who has not read the actual transcript of the exchange between McCarthy and Welch would claim that "Welch had asked McCarthy to name someone and McCarthy named Fisher because his name and history was already known." In fact, McCarthy had already agreed to NOT mention Fisher in the course of the hearings. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 11:03, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
: The VOA investigation was not just about sabotage. I have watched the video of the Welch-McCarthy incident, and the description that was in the article was extremely biased and misleading. I think that it is fine to put the Welch-McCarthy incident in the article, but only if it includes McCarthy's justification for doing what he did. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:19, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
==Cropped section placed here for discussion==
==Cropped section placed here for discussion==