Changes

If a capricious supernatural force was to enter the equation they could not be controlled for and could not be studied.

If a capricious supernatural force was to enter the equation they could not be controlled for and could not be studied.

The physical sciences can only study the natural, not the supernatural, but this is not the same as assuming that the supernatural does not exist.  In addition, there are also the social sciences like history.  [[Christian apologetists|Christian apologists]] maintain that history testifies to the supernatural existing and that the physical sciences (such as [[Bible archaeology]] ) can aid in historical determinations and testify the existence of God and the truth of Biblical Christianity.   

The physical sciences can only study the natural, not the supernatural, but this is not the same as assuming that the supernatural does not exist.  In addition, there are also the social sciences like history.  [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]] maintain that history testifies to the supernatural existing and that the physical sciences (such as [[Biblical archaeology]] ) can aid in historical determinations and testify the existence of God and the truth of Biblical Christianity.   

Instead, three broad philosophies have developed in the scientific community. For example, there are those that follow "[[methodological naturalism]]" and those that follow "[[Philosophical naturalism|philosophical naturalism]]". Those that adhere to methodological naturalism only only adhere to [[naturalism]] insofar as it concerns scientific experiments and observations, but may (and indeed, often do) believe in a personal deity. The latter however subscribe to the belief that there is no force beyond what can be observed; this branch of scientists do not hold supernatural beliefs, or are skeptical of such beliefs. Third, there are those who believe in following the inference to the best explanation regarding whether or not a supernatural or natural cause best explains a past or present observation.<ref>http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1315/</ref><ref>http://www.cgst.edu/publication/journal/43/J43_203_Forum04Abstract.pdf</ref>

Instead, three broad philosophies have developed in the scientific community. For example, there are those that follow "[[methodological naturalism]]" and those that follow "[[Philosophical naturalism|philosophical naturalism]]". Those that adhere to methodological naturalism only only adhere to [[naturalism]] insofar as it concerns scientific experiments and observations, but may (and indeed, often do) believe in a personal deity. The latter however subscribe to the belief that there is no force beyond what can be observed; this branch of scientists do not hold supernatural beliefs, or are skeptical of such beliefs. Third, there are those who believe in following the inference to the best explanation regarding whether or not a supernatural or natural cause best explains a past or present observation.<ref>http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1315/</ref><ref>http://www.cgst.edu/publication/journal/43/J43_203_Forum04Abstract.pdf</ref>