Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 310: Line 310:  
Nor is it indicated that "as he lieth with a woman" is making a distinction between an effeminate versus masculine internal disposition of the partner. Rather the simile and euphemism serves to identify the sexual nature (intercourse) of laying down, and would distinguish it from simply sharing the same real estate to lay down on, as with women.
 
Nor is it indicated that "as he lieth with a woman" is making a distinction between an effeminate versus masculine internal disposition of the partner. Rather the simile and euphemism serves to identify the sexual nature (intercourse) of laying down, and would distinguish it from simply sharing the same real estate to lay down on, as with women.
   −
==Summation===
+
=== Summation ===
    
As the following summation details, the traditional position contends that neither any grammatical aspect, categorical division or cultural context warrants relegating the Levitical injunctions against homosex to merely being prohibitory of idolatrous temple homosex, or belonging to the class of ceremonial laws (which are not the same), or only motive-specific.   
 
As the following summation details, the traditional position contends that neither any grammatical aspect, categorical division or cultural context warrants relegating the Levitical injunctions against homosex to merely being prohibitory of idolatrous temple homosex, or belonging to the class of ceremonial laws (which are not the same), or only motive-specific.   
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,415

edits

Navigation menu