1,106
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:Tracy C Copeland (view source)
Revision as of 21:11, March 24, 2007
, 21:11, March 24, 2007no edit summary
[[User:!!!!!Hitler was a sensitive man|!!!!!Hitler was a sensitive man]] 17:11, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
If you continue to put uncited propoganda into your article sI will ban you. Thatcher was not alcoholic (see [[Talk: Margaret Thatcher]] and UK Conservative party did not splinter into three factions.--[[User:AustinM|AustinM]] 13:38, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:See my notes on the respective talk pages. Nowhere do I allege that Thatcher was an alcoholic; I say (with citations) that parts of the UK media ''claimed'' she was alcoholic which in turn led to her drop in popularity and the Conservative Party's decision to remove her. You reverted a lengthy article on [[John Major]] to the single line "He achieved very little", despite my - cited - source for the expanded article being the Conservative Party's own website.
:: Your article was politically biased and as regards John Major you state that the conservative party split into factions. This is untrue.--[[User:AustinM|AustinM]] 17:05, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
Hi Tracy.
About your Thatcher/Blair articles.
While we may or may not share the same opinion on Margret thatcher, I certainly agree that Sysop AustinM acted very badly in removing your entire edits. If anybody is guilty of vandalism its AustinM. --[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 11:16, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
Hi Tracy. Thanks for suggesting that that I take an interest in the DC article. Truth is that, though I used to be a very active member of the Conservative party, I no longer live in the UK either. I left about 12 years ago for sunnier climes so I'm also not too convinced about my ability to comment confidently about recent activities.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 14:29, 18 March 2007 (EDT)