| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | ===2010 Budget=== | | ===2010 Budget=== |
| | On Feb. 26 Obama proposed to Congress a $3.6 trillion budget containing a sharp shift toward expanded government activism, tax increases on high income families and businesses that are still profitable, with spending cuts targeted at businessmen he says profited from "an era of profound irresponsibility." | | On Feb. 26 Obama proposed to Congress a $3.6 trillion budget containing a sharp shift toward expanded government activism, tax increases on high income families and businesses that are still profitable, with spending cuts targeted at businessmen he says profited from "an era of profound irresponsibility." |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | The Budget assumes federal deficit of $1.75 trillion for 2009, or 12.3% of GDP--the highest deficit in perscentage terms since World War II. By 2013, the hypothetical deficit will drop to $533 billion but then will begin to climb again. The budget includes an additional $250 billion for more rescues of the financial markets by purchasing toxic assets on the banking sector's books. | | The Budget assumes federal deficit of $1.75 trillion for 2009, or 12.3% of GDP--the highest deficit in perscentage terms since World War II. By 2013, the hypothetical deficit will drop to $533 billion but then will begin to climb again. The budget includes an additional $250 billion for more rescues of the financial markets by purchasing toxic assets on the banking sector's books. |
| Line 12: |
Line 11: |
| | The budget reorders national priorities to provide national health care, shift the energy economy away from oil and gas, and raise the federal spending on schools. To fund it all, families earning more than $250,000 and a variety of businesses will pay steep new taxes. Observers expect a fierce political battle over the budget, with conservatives calling it "class warfare" and detrimental to long-term growth.<Ref> see [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123564748462081261.html?mod=djemalertNEWS ''Wall Street Journal'' Feb. 26, 2009]</ref> | | The budget reorders national priorities to provide national health care, shift the energy economy away from oil and gas, and raise the federal spending on schools. To fund it all, families earning more than $250,000 and a variety of businesses will pay steep new taxes. Observers expect a fierce political battle over the budget, with conservatives calling it "class warfare" and detrimental to long-term growth.<Ref> see [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123564748462081261.html?mod=djemalertNEWS ''Wall Street Journal'' Feb. 26, 2009]</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | The chairman of the Senate Budget Committee is conservative Democrat Kent Conrad of North Dakota, a deficit hawk who said he is "very uncomfortable with the build-up of debt" and urged Obama to make good on his promise to overhaul federal retirement and health-care programs. Conrad called for "more discipline on the spending side."<ref> [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/28/AR2009022801960.html?hpid=topnews ''Washington Post'' Mar. 1, 2009]</ref> | + | The chairman of the Senate Budget Committee is conservative Democrat [[Kent Conrad]] of [[North Dakota]], a deficit hawk who said he is "very uncomfortable with the build-up of debt" and urged Obama to make good on his promise to overhaul federal retirement and health-care programs. Conrad called for "more discipline on the spending side."<ref> [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/28/AR2009022801960.html?hpid=topnews ''Washington Post'' Mar. 1, 2009]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ===Optimism or pessimism?=== | | ===Optimism or pessimism?=== |