Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 222: Line 222:     
:*And a wiki isn't used in international communication? One would have to find the many amendments and definitions of the applicable laws. In any event, this is another [[liberal deceit]], a distraction from our  purpose here, which is building an encyclopedia, NOT discussing if common vandals and cyber terrorists will be punished.  Umlaut, you are in violation of the [[Conservapedia Commandments]] with your endless talk, talk, talk.  I invite you to make substantive contributions here, or busy yourself elsewhere. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 07:39, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 
:*And a wiki isn't used in international communication? One would have to find the many amendments and definitions of the applicable laws. In any event, this is another [[liberal deceit]], a distraction from our  purpose here, which is building an encyclopedia, NOT discussing if common vandals and cyber terrorists will be punished.  Umlaut, you are in violation of the [[Conservapedia Commandments]] with your endless talk, talk, talk.  I invite you to make substantive contributions here, or busy yourself elsewhere. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 07:39, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::Whether vandalism and "cyber terrorism" to this or any other wiki or site is illegal is not the question (though I think it isn't).  My point was that 18 USC § 1030 appears to be an inappropriate citation.  Pointing out such an inaccuracy (or perceived inaccuracy) is certainly a contribution to Conservapedia. [[User:Umlaut|Umlaut]] 08:02, 2 March 2009 (EST)
18

edits

Navigation menu