Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: +
→Global Warming
Are you sure you want to edit this page further? You are obviously in disagreement with what is presented. The entire page is a rebuke of global warming orthodoxy. Maybe you should start a counter-arguments page.--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 13:04, 2 March 2009 (EST)
Are you sure you want to edit this page further? You are obviously in disagreement with what is presented. The entire page is a rebuke of global warming orthodoxy. Maybe you should start a counter-arguments page.--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 13:04, 2 March 2009 (EST)
:But surely your statement says something about what is wrong with the article. It purports to be an article about Global Warming but as you say it is in fact simply a rebuke. I understand there are people who disagree with the concept of global warming but as someone who is currently studying the subject I think I can help here. The issue needn't be a political one as has been framed here. Though of course there are politicians and groups who use global warming to meet their own ends there is no reason why the article on the subject should be distracted from the actual science (which almost universally accepts global warming as fact) by political squabbles. [[User:RobertWDP|RobertWDP]] 14:31, 2 March 2009 (EST)
:But surely your statement says something about what is wrong with the article. It purports to be an article about Global Warming but as you say it is in fact simply a rebuke. I understand there are people who disagree with the concept of global warming but as someone who is currently studying the subject I think I can help here. The issue needn't be a political one as has been framed here. Though of course there are politicians and groups who use global warming to meet their own ends there is no reason why the article on the subject should be distracted from the actual science (which almost universally accepts global warming as fact) by political squabbles. [[User:RobertWDP|RobertWDP]] 14:31, 2 March 2009 (EST)
::The disagreement we have has to do with the "man-made" part of it. The scientists who "say" man is causing it are doing so in an effort to get money, specifically money from the U.S. These same scientists refuse to acknowledge the sun's influence in the matter; they refuse to acknowledge natural events as contributing factors, such as a volcanic eruption; it is man in general, and the American man in particular. I put "say" in quote marks because of the fact that we have to take these people at their word, or so they want us to think. What they "say" about it does not make it a fact. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:41, 2 March 2009 (EST)