Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
6,631
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
World History Homework Five Answers - Student One (view source)
Revision as of 20:23, March 3, 2009
, 20:23, March 3, 2009New page: ~~~~ 1.The Five Pillars of Islam are submission to God, fasting during Ramadan, the Hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca), almsgiving, and prayer five times daily facing Mecca in...
[[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 15:23, 3 March 2009 (EST)
1.The [[Five Pillars of Islam]] are submission to [[God]], fasting during [[Ramadan]], the [[Hajj]] (pilgrimage to Mecca), almsgiving, and [[prayer]] five times daily facing Mecca in the East. These are the most fundamental requirements of all [[Muslim]]s.
2.The major difference between Islam and [[Christianity]] is that Islam combines [[government]]al and [[military]] ideas with [[religious]] ones. Christianity instructs its followers to be good [[citizen]]s and follow their own governments for the most part ([[Jesus]] said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s," and the [[Bible]] and Christian tradition uphold good citizenship), while Islam, at least for much of its past, has militarily conquered land and set up its own government. Islam adopted some of the violence that seems typical in the [[Middle East]], and contains elements of theocracy, making it both a religion and an ideology. [[Shariah]] is considered the only fully approved form of government in Shia Islam.
3.I equally like [[Charles the Hammer]] and [[Charlemagne]]. Charles the Hammer famously won the [[Battle of Tours]] in 732, saving [[Europe]] from a Muslim military invasion. This preserved Christianity in [[Europe]] and also kept peace. Charlemagne almost re-established a civilized and overarching central government with the [[Holy Roman Empire]], and he introduced [[education]] and [[civilization]] where there had been very little.
4.I like that [[feudalism]] seems to be a great improvisation. It began rather haphazardly but it worked very well. Even though there was no strong central government like in the [[Roman Empire]], Europe functioned much as though there was. The fact that all the land was owned, and that peasants could not move, made the system very stable and difficult to disrupt. I imagine it like a square board cut into pieces and surrounded by a frame. Whatever happens on top of the board, the board itself remains intact.
However, just because it worked doesn’t mean it was all good. In the case of peasants, they received stability but lost freedom. It was all good on the plot of land you worked, but you could never change jobs or leave. Lords and vassals on the other hand could do almost anything they wanted. In modern terms, feudalism lacked a middle class- there were the poor peasants or serfs, and the rich lords and vassals, with few people in between.
5.[[Sunni]]s are more moderate than [[Shi’ites]]. Also, Shi’ites believe that the caliph, the successor of [[Mohammad]], must be from the “Ahl al-Bayt,” meaning the family of Mohammad. Sunnis do not require the caliph to be descended from Mohammad. The Shi’ites are much smaller than the Sunnis as well. [[Iran]] is ruled by Shi’ites, [[Saudi Arabia]] is ruled by the Sunnis.
6.I find it interesting that most countries are either mostly Muslim or only a little bit Muslim- few are in between. One reason this might be is that Islam really only grew where Muslims had invaded. Arabia, the Middle East, [[Africa]], and parts of Southeast [[Asia]] were invaded by Muslims and subsequently became substantially Islamic. Other places, like Europe and North America, have not been invaded and have only minorities of Muslims. In short, Islam cannot evangelize as well as Christianity, so it has only grown where it used the military.
7.The Teotihuacan (AD 100-900) was the earliest of the five major pre-Columbian South and Latin American civilzations. They had cities and an upper class of priests and nobles.
The [[Maya]] were located on the Yucatan Peninsula and lasted from AD 300-900. They knew some astronomy and developed [[mathematics]] (including the concept of [[zero]]), a written [[language]], and a [[calendar]]. They also built ziggurat-like pyramids. The idea that the apocalypse will happen in 2012 comes from the Mayan calendar.
The [[Aztecs]] (AD 1200-1521) were great architects, as shown by their capital city, Tenochtitlan. The city was wonderfully contructed and was located in a lake, connected to the coast by causeways. However, the Aztecs were much more efficient in war than in civilization. They practiced copious human sacrifice.
The Incas (AD 1250-1525) created an efficient empire in a difficult terrain. Based in the Andes Mountains, they used different elevations to help grow different crops, and, lacking a language, used a cord system similar to an abacus as an accounting and recording tool. They built roads lined with supply centers and organized small groups of people to get community work done. The famous city of Machu Picchu was an Inca city.
Honors
2.I absolutely believe that [[democracy]] is possible in [[Iraq]]. True, we have not fully succeeded in six years, and true, the Middle East is a traditionally violent place, but six years of partial failure does not mean we can never succeed. When there were [[election]]s in Iraq, common people were excited to come out and vote. I remember seeing a photo of a woman in a burqua smiling and giving the peace sign. I remember hearing that the dictator [[Saddam Hussein]] was only revered because everyone was terrified of him. I think that the common people as a whole really want freedom, and that if the theocracies and dictatorships were removed, there could be peaceful democracy. Yes, Iraqi elections were under close watch by the military, but hey, a similar situation took place in our nation in the South after the [[Civil War]]. Federal government officials had to monitor elections to prevent African Americans from being disenfranchised by the KKK and other violent [[racist]]s. But we overcame it. So can Iraq. Whether the government uses Islam, [[Communism]], or [[Juche]] to oppress the people, it is almost impossible to destroy the desire for freedom that exists in man.
3.I think [[chivalry]] is good in itself, and certainly worked well in feudal times, but I think it is slightly outdated today. When it comes to codes of behavior of any sort, I prefer that they be based directly on the Bible or Christian practice, as oppose to some sort of cultural code. I’ve said before that the 1950s lead to a backlash because the societal codes were not based enough on Christianity, but rather on a less tangible, less persuasive idea. Something like this, including chivalry, may include in itself the seeds of the backlash. Christianity does not. Thus, any code of manners or behavior should be based as closely as possible on the [[Gospel]].
6.Islam has three dimensions: Islam (submission), Imam (faith or belief) and Ihsan (perfection or excellence). The [[Qur’an]] itself differentiates between Islam and Imam: “Do not say ‘we have accepted faith’; rather say ‘we have accepted Islam,’ for faith has not yet entered your hearts.” Thus submission does not replace faith in Islam, but works alongside it. In addition to the Five Pillars, there are also six Articles of Faith: belief in God, angels, Books of God (such as the Qur’an), Prophets, Day of Judgement, and destiny or divine judgement. Thus, there is a conception of faith in Islam, but it is not as central as in Christianity. Judaism also has the concept of faith, although again it is less important than in Christianity. Hinduism has an idea of faith as well: it is called Śraddhā and means strong belief and purity of thought. However, there is much debate about the details of this faith.
I do think that Christianity has the greatest conception of faith, and I think religions further from Christianity have lesser conceptions of faith. But I think that most religions have some idea of faith.
But there is yet another way to look at this: each religion may have a different kind or “flavor” of faith- perhaps you cannot even compare faiths. In this view, it is perfectly valid to say that only Christianity has Christian faith, only Islam has Islamic faith, etc.
1.The [[Five Pillars of Islam]] are submission to [[God]], fasting during [[Ramadan]], the [[Hajj]] (pilgrimage to Mecca), almsgiving, and [[prayer]] five times daily facing Mecca in the East. These are the most fundamental requirements of all [[Muslim]]s.
2.The major difference between Islam and [[Christianity]] is that Islam combines [[government]]al and [[military]] ideas with [[religious]] ones. Christianity instructs its followers to be good [[citizen]]s and follow their own governments for the most part ([[Jesus]] said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s," and the [[Bible]] and Christian tradition uphold good citizenship), while Islam, at least for much of its past, has militarily conquered land and set up its own government. Islam adopted some of the violence that seems typical in the [[Middle East]], and contains elements of theocracy, making it both a religion and an ideology. [[Shariah]] is considered the only fully approved form of government in Shia Islam.
3.I equally like [[Charles the Hammer]] and [[Charlemagne]]. Charles the Hammer famously won the [[Battle of Tours]] in 732, saving [[Europe]] from a Muslim military invasion. This preserved Christianity in [[Europe]] and also kept peace. Charlemagne almost re-established a civilized and overarching central government with the [[Holy Roman Empire]], and he introduced [[education]] and [[civilization]] where there had been very little.
4.I like that [[feudalism]] seems to be a great improvisation. It began rather haphazardly but it worked very well. Even though there was no strong central government like in the [[Roman Empire]], Europe functioned much as though there was. The fact that all the land was owned, and that peasants could not move, made the system very stable and difficult to disrupt. I imagine it like a square board cut into pieces and surrounded by a frame. Whatever happens on top of the board, the board itself remains intact.
However, just because it worked doesn’t mean it was all good. In the case of peasants, they received stability but lost freedom. It was all good on the plot of land you worked, but you could never change jobs or leave. Lords and vassals on the other hand could do almost anything they wanted. In modern terms, feudalism lacked a middle class- there were the poor peasants or serfs, and the rich lords and vassals, with few people in between.
5.[[Sunni]]s are more moderate than [[Shi’ites]]. Also, Shi’ites believe that the caliph, the successor of [[Mohammad]], must be from the “Ahl al-Bayt,” meaning the family of Mohammad. Sunnis do not require the caliph to be descended from Mohammad. The Shi’ites are much smaller than the Sunnis as well. [[Iran]] is ruled by Shi’ites, [[Saudi Arabia]] is ruled by the Sunnis.
6.I find it interesting that most countries are either mostly Muslim or only a little bit Muslim- few are in between. One reason this might be is that Islam really only grew where Muslims had invaded. Arabia, the Middle East, [[Africa]], and parts of Southeast [[Asia]] were invaded by Muslims and subsequently became substantially Islamic. Other places, like Europe and North America, have not been invaded and have only minorities of Muslims. In short, Islam cannot evangelize as well as Christianity, so it has only grown where it used the military.
7.The Teotihuacan (AD 100-900) was the earliest of the five major pre-Columbian South and Latin American civilzations. They had cities and an upper class of priests and nobles.
The [[Maya]] were located on the Yucatan Peninsula and lasted from AD 300-900. They knew some astronomy and developed [[mathematics]] (including the concept of [[zero]]), a written [[language]], and a [[calendar]]. They also built ziggurat-like pyramids. The idea that the apocalypse will happen in 2012 comes from the Mayan calendar.
The [[Aztecs]] (AD 1200-1521) were great architects, as shown by their capital city, Tenochtitlan. The city was wonderfully contructed and was located in a lake, connected to the coast by causeways. However, the Aztecs were much more efficient in war than in civilization. They practiced copious human sacrifice.
The Incas (AD 1250-1525) created an efficient empire in a difficult terrain. Based in the Andes Mountains, they used different elevations to help grow different crops, and, lacking a language, used a cord system similar to an abacus as an accounting and recording tool. They built roads lined with supply centers and organized small groups of people to get community work done. The famous city of Machu Picchu was an Inca city.
Honors
2.I absolutely believe that [[democracy]] is possible in [[Iraq]]. True, we have not fully succeeded in six years, and true, the Middle East is a traditionally violent place, but six years of partial failure does not mean we can never succeed. When there were [[election]]s in Iraq, common people were excited to come out and vote. I remember seeing a photo of a woman in a burqua smiling and giving the peace sign. I remember hearing that the dictator [[Saddam Hussein]] was only revered because everyone was terrified of him. I think that the common people as a whole really want freedom, and that if the theocracies and dictatorships were removed, there could be peaceful democracy. Yes, Iraqi elections were under close watch by the military, but hey, a similar situation took place in our nation in the South after the [[Civil War]]. Federal government officials had to monitor elections to prevent African Americans from being disenfranchised by the KKK and other violent [[racist]]s. But we overcame it. So can Iraq. Whether the government uses Islam, [[Communism]], or [[Juche]] to oppress the people, it is almost impossible to destroy the desire for freedom that exists in man.
3.I think [[chivalry]] is good in itself, and certainly worked well in feudal times, but I think it is slightly outdated today. When it comes to codes of behavior of any sort, I prefer that they be based directly on the Bible or Christian practice, as oppose to some sort of cultural code. I’ve said before that the 1950s lead to a backlash because the societal codes were not based enough on Christianity, but rather on a less tangible, less persuasive idea. Something like this, including chivalry, may include in itself the seeds of the backlash. Christianity does not. Thus, any code of manners or behavior should be based as closely as possible on the [[Gospel]].
6.Islam has three dimensions: Islam (submission), Imam (faith or belief) and Ihsan (perfection or excellence). The [[Qur’an]] itself differentiates between Islam and Imam: “Do not say ‘we have accepted faith’; rather say ‘we have accepted Islam,’ for faith has not yet entered your hearts.” Thus submission does not replace faith in Islam, but works alongside it. In addition to the Five Pillars, there are also six Articles of Faith: belief in God, angels, Books of God (such as the Qur’an), Prophets, Day of Judgement, and destiny or divine judgement. Thus, there is a conception of faith in Islam, but it is not as central as in Christianity. Judaism also has the concept of faith, although again it is less important than in Christianity. Hinduism has an idea of faith as well: it is called Śraddhā and means strong belief and purity of thought. However, there is much debate about the details of this faith.
I do think that Christianity has the greatest conception of faith, and I think religions further from Christianity have lesser conceptions of faith. But I think that most religions have some idea of faith.
But there is yet another way to look at this: each religion may have a different kind or “flavor” of faith- perhaps you cannot even compare faiths. In this view, it is perfectly valid to say that only Christianity has Christian faith, only Islam has Islamic faith, etc.