Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
266 bytes added ,  13:51, March 4, 2009
Line 185: Line 185:  
::::I could refute alot of things you said there but I'll stay on topic.  By natural I mean the view that relies on natural processes rather than supernatural.  The article already goes with this.  It says "Most scientists today conclude that the Earth formed by natural processes, specifically by the accumulation of debris orbiting the sun billions of years in the past."  {{unsigned|Glorfon}}
 
::::I could refute alot of things you said there but I'll stay on topic.  By natural I mean the view that relies on natural processes rather than supernatural.  The article already goes with this.  It says "Most scientists today conclude that the Earth formed by natural processes, specifically by the accumulation of debris orbiting the sun billions of years in the past."  {{unsigned|Glorfon}}
 
::::: You could ''try'' refuting a lot of the things I said, but whether you refutations would be correct is another matter.  The view that ''relies on'' natural processes is ''naturalism'', the ''belief'' that everything can be/must be explained by natural processes.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:56, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: You could ''try'' refuting a lot of the things I said, but whether you refutations would be correct is another matter.  The view that ''relies on'' natural processes is ''naturalism'', the ''belief'' that everything can be/must be explained by natural processes.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:56, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== I must aopluad this article ==
 +
 +
Unlike the other articles I have visited: this one at least doesn't have the blatantly conservative christian POV in it: though the non creationism section is a little small..--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 08:51, 4 March 2009 (EST)
1

edit

Navigation menu