3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 877:
Line 877: − +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 01:45, March 10, 2009
, 01:45, March 10, 2009→Is #150 really relevant? (The criticism of GWB/BHO)
The claim that G. W. Bush "was called a supporter of the Nazi regime" on his wikipedia page is very believable, but could someone find a reference proving it? [[User:Sjay|Sjay]] 20:50, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
The claim that G. W. Bush "was called a supporter of the Nazi regime" on his wikipedia page is very believable, but could someone find a reference proving it? [[User:Sjay|Sjay]] 20:50, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
== Is #150 really relavent? (The criticism of GWB/BHO) ==
== Is #150 really relevant? (The criticism of GWB/BHO) ==
Looking back at the history of the "Presidency of George W. Bush" article, the Criticism section was not added to the article until July 5th, 2006. If Wikipedia had a liberal bias wouldn't they have added that much sooner? BHO has been in power for less then two months, not enough time to form a valid criticism of his presidency as a whole.
Looking back at the history of the "Presidency of George W. Bush" article, the Criticism section was not added to the article until July 5th, 2006. If Wikipedia had a liberal bias wouldn't they have added that much sooner? BHO has been in power for less then two months, not enough time to form a valid criticism of his presidency as a whole.