| Line 477: |
Line 477: |
| | | | |
| | :::: I agree with ASchlafly, it's not as if a Bible would have been hard to find, or as if the second oath was so urgent that there was no time to find one. And why is a second oath needed if the first one was 'real, valid and legally binding'? I doubt he did it for his own amusement: "Hey guys, that was fun, let's do it again!" [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 14:13, 6 March 2009 (EST) | | :::: I agree with ASchlafly, it's not as if a Bible would have been hard to find, or as if the second oath was so urgent that there was no time to find one. And why is a second oath needed if the first one was 'real, valid and legally binding'? I doubt he did it for his own amusement: "Hey guys, that was fun, let's do it again!" [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 14:13, 6 March 2009 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::: But that isn't the point. And Aschlafly, I'm sorry you couldn't understand my suggestion. But the fact that you don't like it doesn't make it a rant. I'll explain again, in simpler terms: |
| | + | :::::1) Obama didn't use a bible for his second oath. |
| | + | :::::2) It is possible, even likely, that he "chose not to use" a bible. |
| | + | :::::3) However, there is nothing to support the view that he "chose not to." There's no extant source to back this up |
| | + | :::::4) Therefore, this article is making a logical deduction |
| | + | :::::5) Encyclopedias do not deduce, speculate, assume or opinionate. They state proven facts |
| | + | |
| | + | :::::It doesn't matter if that is the only logical explanation. Without any proof, it's just speculation, regardless of how likely it is. Unless someone can supply a reputable source that says Obama chose not to use a bible, this is an assumption. That makes it biased. Saying "there's no disputing" something isn't the same as proving it. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::: As to the "real" oath, basic research indicates it was done out of a "superabundance of caution," not because it was legally necessary. See this article: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iJKZrJDhy6g52PZNb7phfFmsQVow A "seeker of truth" would know this, or at least try to find out. [[User:Dantès|Dantès]] 14:52, 12 March 2009 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | == Obama is likely the first Muslim President == | | == Obama is likely the first Muslim President == |