Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 118:
Line 118: + +
Talk:Significance of E. Coli Evolution Experiments (view source)
Revision as of 14:23, March 14, 2009
, 14:23, March 14, 2009nope, Fred
:::: It looks to me as though SJohnson has misinterpreted the application of the chi-squared test in quite a fundamental way. His/her analysis of Blount's data are therefore close to meaningless, regardless of whether the test used by Blount is appropriate or not. In my opinion, the entire page should therefore be deleted. [[User:FredFerguson|FredFerguson]] 08:18, 13 March 2009 (EDT)
:::: It looks to me as though SJohnson has misinterpreted the application of the chi-squared test in quite a fundamental way. His/her analysis of Blount's data are therefore close to meaningless, regardless of whether the test used by Blount is appropriate or not. In my opinion, the entire page should therefore be deleted. [[User:FredFerguson|FredFerguson]] 08:18, 13 March 2009 (EDT)
::::: "Fred", perhaps you mistakenly think this is Wikipedia, where [[censorship]] and deletion of pages for ideological reasons are common. Not here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:23, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
== Misinterpretation of test ==
== Misinterpretation of test ==