1,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − ==='''yes...'''===+ Line 9:
Line 9: − ==='''no...'''===+
Debate:Was world war inevitable? (view source)
Revision as of 18:55, December 18, 2006
, 18:55, December 18, 2006no edit summary
=='''Post Your Thoughts'''==
=='''Post Your Thoughts'''==
== '''Yes:''' ==
Probably
Probably
Chain Reaction...
Chain Reaction...
In the case of WWII Hitler and the Japanese were determined to take over the world. (At least Europe and Asia) The rest of the world was not about to let that happen without a fight. This made WWII inevitable.
In the case of WWII Hitler and the Japanese were determined to take over the world. (At least Europe and Asia) The rest of the world was not about to let that happen without a fight. This made WWII inevitable.
== '''No:''' ==
War is almost never "inevitable". War results when both sides think they can win, and believe that the bloodshed is worth it. But both sides cannot win a contest so faulty information is part of the problem.
War is almost never "inevitable". War results when both sides think they can win, and believe that the bloodshed is worth it. But both sides cannot win a contest so faulty information is part of the problem.