Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply to RJJensen
Line 40: Line 40:  
RJ, could you expound again on the ideas which Machiavelli and the Founders ''both'' liked? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:26, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
 
RJ, could you expound again on the ideas which Machiavelli and the Founders ''both'' liked? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:26, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
 
::::::Responding to Ed-- M's influence can be seen in the ideas that the good citizen has to watch out for politicians, & has to take part in politics. M. was the major porponent of the citizens militia (as oppose to standing armies or mercenries) as the best defense and the need for citizens to join the militia (which is now the National Guard). The argument by historians is that Machiavelli had a major direct influence on the English "country party" which provided the main intellectual base for the American Revolution. That is, Americans absorb Machiavelli, Locke, Hume, Harrington, Montesquieu etc through the founding fathers rather than by directly reading these people in 2009.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 19:40, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
 
::::::Responding to Ed-- M's influence can be seen in the ideas that the good citizen has to watch out for politicians, & has to take part in politics. M. was the major porponent of the citizens militia (as oppose to standing armies or mercenries) as the best defense and the need for citizens to join the militia (which is now the National Guard). The argument by historians is that Machiavelli had a major direct influence on the English "country party" which provided the main intellectual base for the American Revolution. That is, Americans absorb Machiavelli, Locke, Hume, Harrington, Montesquieu etc through the founding fathers rather than by directly reading these people in 2009.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 19:40, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::: The flaw in that argument is that Machiavelli was long viewed with disdain, while the other political philosophers were not.  Moreover, there's nothing special about an armed citizenry that should be attributed to Machiavelli in particular, as opposed to countless others political commentators going back to feudal times who felt the same way.
 +
 +
::::::: Liberals like Machiavelli for the same reason that others held him in disdain.  Liberals really do think the "end justifies the means," and they really worship political status rather than genuine achievement.  Machiavelli is a hero to liberals, and hence the attempt to rehabilitate him by liberal historians.  Don't take that personally, as I criticize liberals in the legal field also and hopefully historians welcome some accountability in their field.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:11, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,928

edits

Navigation menu