Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  06:23, March 22, 2009
Line 12: Line 12:     
==Neo-orthodoxy and Christian Fundamentalism==
 
==Neo-orthodoxy and Christian Fundamentalism==
−
A useful but somewhat simplistic way of defining neo-orthodoxy is to define it as the rejection of Professor [[Wilhelm Herrmann]] teachings by some of his students—in this sense [[fundamentalism|anti-modernism]] is a branch of neo-orthodoxy.  For [[John Gresham Machen]], who traveled to Germany and studied with Herrmann in 1905, is a key figure in the formation of Christian Fundamentalism.  Above all, the common ground between [[fundamentalism|anti-modernism]], and Neo-orthodoxy is the acceptance and evangelism of the [[sin|doctrine of Sin]].  A significant difference is the solution to the problem of sin. [[fundamentalism|Anti-modernism]] espouses the [[Salvation|doctrine of Salvation]], while neo-orthodoxy remains eerily silent on such a solution despite all its vociferousness about the [[sin|doctrine of Sin]].
+
A useful but somewhat simplistic way of defining neo-orthodoxy is to define it as the rejection of Professor [[Wilhelm Herrmann]] teachings by some of his students—in this sense [[fundamentalism|anti-modernism]] is a branch of neo-orthodoxy.  For [[John Gresham Machen]], who traveled to Germany and studied with Herrmann in 1905, is a key figure in the formation of Christian Conservativism.  Above all, the common ground between [[fundamentalism|anti-modernism]], and Neo-orthodoxy is the acceptance and evangelism of the [[sin|doctrine of Sin]].  A significant difference is the solution to the problem of sin. [[fundamentalism|Anti-modernism]] espouses the [[Salvation|doctrine of Salvation]], while neo-orthodoxy remains eerily silent on such a solution despite all its vociferousness about the [[sin|doctrine of Sin]].
    
===Neo-orthodoxy and Reformed theology===
 
===Neo-orthodoxy and Reformed theology===
1,887

edits

Navigation menu