Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 392: Line 392:  
"There shall be no whore [qedêshâh] of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite [qâdêsh] of the sons of Israel. {18} Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog, into the house of the LORD thy God for any vow: for even both these are abomination unto the LORD thy God."
 
"There shall be no whore [qedêshâh] of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite [qâdêsh] of the sons of Israel. {18} Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog, into the house of the LORD thy God for any vow: for even both these are abomination unto the LORD thy God."
   −
Rather than this passage being the specifically religious application of the general Levitical injunctions against homosex, those who favor that practice usually contend that the former is what Lv. 18:22; 20:13 only refers to. The key word at issue here is ''qâdêsh'' [H6945], the basic meaning of which is ''sacred'', contextually referring to temple prostitute, which the translators of the [[King James Version]] rendered as "sodomite", due to its perceived denotation of men whose manner of sex was like that of dogs.   
+
Rather than this passage being the specifically religious application of the general Levitical injunctions against homosex, those who favor that practice usually contend that the former is what Lv. 18:22; 20:13 only refers to. The key word at issue here is ''qâdêsh'' [H6945], the basic meaning of which is ''sacred'', contextually referring to temple prostitute, which the translators of the [[King James Version]] rendered as "sodomite", due to its perceived denotation of men whose manner of sex was like that of dogs.<ref>John Barclay Burns, Devotee or Deviate</ref>    
    
Keil and Delitzsch comment that "the price of a dog” is not the price paid for the sale of a dog (Bochart, Spencer, Iken, Baumgarten, etc.), but is a figurative expression used to denote the gains of the kadesh, who was called κίναιδος by the Greeks, and received his name from the dog-like manner in which the male kadesh debased himself.<ref>Keil and Delitzch</ref>
 
Keil and Delitzsch comment that "the price of a dog” is not the price paid for the sale of a dog (Bochart, Spencer, Iken, Baumgarten, etc.), but is a figurative expression used to denote the gains of the kadesh, who was called κίναιδος by the Greeks, and received his name from the dog-like manner in which the male kadesh debased himself.<ref>Keil and Delitzch</ref>
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,415

edits

Navigation menu