119
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Thanks for your interesting entries. − − I'm not sure what you mean by saying that Bush's reelection in 2004 was controversial.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:56, 24 February 2007 (EST) − − :Many people assert that Bush "stole" the election because of voting fraud. They cite discrepancies between polling and actual vote counts. I don't take it seriously, but apparently many liberals do. This is a popular article, though I didn't know how to include it in the page on Bush. http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 01:03 24 February 2007 (EST) − − ::OK, but sore losers are common. I'm not sure sour grapes by liberals in 2004 makes the election outcome controversial. Is JFK's victory in 1960 also described by liberals as "controversial"? Tell you what, I'll just go ahead and make an edit to [[George W. Bush]]. Thanks again for your interesting entries and edits, which are superb.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:26, 24 February 2007 (EST) − − :::Thanks for the compliment! As for the [[George W. Bush]] entry, hopefully other users will provide some input on whether or not "controversy" is warranted.--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 01:37 24 February 2007 (EST) − − == Relativity edit == − − [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_Relativity&curid=4171&diff=16308&oldid=15423] I don't see what is parody about that edit (in fact, it looks to me like one of the few things on that page that makes sense). [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 19:02, 24 February 2007 (EST) − − :While there are many jokes revolving around Relativity, it's not used to support relative morality. The part that I removed was an attempt to parody Christians' genuine rebuttal of evolutionary moral standards. Evolution implies relative morality and so creationists attack the unproven theory by demonstrating why their moral standards are flawed. Evolutionists don't like it when creationists refute this part of their so-called science and so I think they're attempting to mock the argument by applying the same reasoning to Relativity.--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 10:17 25 February 2007 (EST) − − :: Um, if one actually reads post-modern discussions of morality (which I don't generally recommend one does), references to using some notion of relativity as being justified by Einstein occur all the time. As point of fact, I have never actually seen claims that evolution implies some form of moral relativity outside creationist circles. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 13:52, 25 February 2007 (EST) − − == Evidence for evolution == − − You asked on my wall why you should trust scientists, since they never back up evolution with facts. − − I understand your confusion. It's a complicated theory. But if you keep an open mind and are actually curious, I'd be happy to suggest a book on evolution for you.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 10:45, 14 March 2007 (EDT) −
Removed old entries.
== Fred Phelps ==
== Fred Phelps ==