184
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 117:
Line 117: − [[Image:Syria location map.svg|thumb|right|''Map of Modern Syria'']]+ Line 145:
Line 145: − +
→Criticism of the Futurist Interpretation of the “Oracle of Damascus”
==Criticism of the Futurist Interpretation of the “Oracle of Damascus”==
==Criticism of the Futurist Interpretation of the “Oracle of Damascus”==
In “The Rejection of Pascal’s Wagner – A Skeptic’s Guide to Christianity” in the section dealing with “Isaiah’s Failed Prophecies”<ref>{{cite web |url=http://geocities.com/paulntobin/prophecies.html#2 |title=Isaiah's Failed Prophecies}} </ref> it states:
In “The Rejection of Pascal’s Wagner – A Skeptic’s Guide to Christianity” in the section dealing with “Isaiah’s Failed Prophecies”<ref>{{cite web |url=http://geocities.com/paulntobin/prophecies.html#2 |title=Isaiah's Failed Prophecies}} </ref> it states:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
The late [[Premillenial]] [[Evangelical]] [[John Walvoord]] of [[Dallas Theological Seminary]] believed that the Prophecy against Damascus was “fulfilled in history and prophecy” (i.e., there is no future fulfillment):
The late Premillenial Evangelical John Walvoord of Dallas Theological Seminary (Dallas, Texas) believed that the Prophecy against Damascus was “fulfilled in history and prophecy” (i.e., there is no future fulfillment):
<blockquote>
<blockquote>