Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Copernicus: reply to Clement
Line 86: Line 86:  
::::*Tolosani's critique of Copernicus is from 1546. But I thought you weren't so fussy when it comes to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=World_History_Lecture_Eight&diff=prev&oldid=644754 dates]...
 
::::*Tolosani's critique of Copernicus is from 1546. But I thought you weren't so fussy when it comes to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=World_History_Lecture_Eight&diff=prev&oldid=644754 dates]...
 
::::[[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 12:30, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 
::::[[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 12:30, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::  Clement, if you want me to respond to your comments, then you have to respond to mine.  There's no disputing that Protestants were the leaders in attacking Copernicus, and that the Catholic reaction was in the wake of the Protestant attack.  I'm not criticizing the Protestants, but am debunking the myth that the Catholic position on this particular issue was more objectionable than the Protestant one.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:49, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
    
== Second Attempt ==
 
== Second Attempt ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,208

edits

Navigation menu