Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 90:
Line 90: + + + +
Talk:World History Lecture Eight (view source)
Revision as of 23:46, March 26, 2009
, 23:46, March 26, 2009→Copernicus: reply, probably for the last time, to Clement
:::::: ''There's no disputing that Protestants were the leaders in attacking Copernicus, and that the Catholic reaction was in the wake of the Protestant attack. '' Sorry, but E. Rosen in the article above does exactly this: he disputes that Protestants were the leaders, and that the Catholics only reacted. It seems that both held positions equally objectionable, while in your lecture, you ''are'' criticizing the Protestants exclusively. [[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 18:14, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
:::::: ''There's no disputing that Protestants were the leaders in attacking Copernicus, and that the Catholic reaction was in the wake of the Protestant attack. '' Sorry, but E. Rosen in the article above does exactly this: he disputes that Protestants were the leaders, and that the Catholics only reacted. It seems that both held positions equally objectionable, while in your lecture, you ''are'' criticizing the Protestants exclusively. [[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 18:14, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
::::::: Clement, your statements are baseless and your provide no quotes to support them, and I haven't criticized Protestants or Catholics in this context. The title of the article you cite is absurd, as the pope does not "approve" scientific theories.
::::::: I'm going to stop wasting my time responding to your comments unless you become more substantive and fair in your remarks. Also, note our [[Conservapedia:Commandments]]. They apply to your edits too.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:46, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
== Second Attempt ==
== Second Attempt ==