17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 287:
Line 287: + +
Talk:Significance of E. Coli Evolution Experiments (view source)
Revision as of 16:35, March 27, 2009
, 16:35, March 27, 2009no edit summary
::::My intention is not to get caught up in a digression about Monte Carlo, though - I'd rather keep the focus on the fact that the main article should acknowledge that SJohnson is using chi-square in a way that violates accepted guidelines; this remains true whether Blount's analysis is valid or not.--[[User:ElyM|ElyM]] 12:13, 23 March 2009 (EDT)
::::My intention is not to get caught up in a digression about Monte Carlo, though - I'd rather keep the focus on the fact that the main article should acknowledge that SJohnson is using chi-square in a way that violates accepted guidelines; this remains true whether Blount's analysis is valid or not.--[[User:ElyM|ElyM]] 12:13, 23 March 2009 (EDT)
==Caveat==
If SJohnson can provide citations to authors who support the use of chi-square where all expected cell counts are less than one, or where categories are not independent, I look forward to evaluating them.--[[User:ElyM|ElyM]] 12:35, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}