5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 117:
Line 117: + + + +
Talk:Religion of Barack Obama (view source)
Revision as of 19:20, March 27, 2009
, 19:20, March 27, 2009→corrections: new section
* You don't need to be a [Christian] to celebrate [Christmas and Easter] (no, indeed you don't-- so the holiday point could only count on the pro side if his observance is religious-- otherwise, it's irrelevant to either side.)
* You don't need to be a [Christian] to celebrate [Christmas and Easter] (no, indeed you don't-- so the holiday point could only count on the pro side if his observance is religious-- otherwise, it's irrelevant to either side.)
* I don't think the bit about involvement in politics being counter to the Bible and Koran is especially helpful-- or at least, it's putting a '''very''' broad brush into the tar. [[User:Pepperlynn|Pepperlynn]] 00:28, 10 March 2009 (EDT)
* I don't think the bit about involvement in politics being counter to the Bible and Koran is especially helpful-- or at least, it's putting a '''very''' broad brush into the tar. [[User:Pepperlynn|Pepperlynn]] 00:28, 10 March 2009 (EDT)
== corrections ==
some of these corrections don't even make sense. Why should "Born to a Christian-turned-secular mother" be changed into "mother who abandoned Christianity"? The sentence Newsweek used is far less judgmental.--[[User:CiaraTo|CiaraTo]] 15:20, 27 March 2009 (EDT)