34
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 220:
Line 220: +
→Obama will Fail
:This is absurd. Karajou plainly started an argument out of nowhere, accusing FNNoonan of things that he had never said. As I was reading this argument, I was struck by how rude, thankless and spiteful Karajou was being to someone who gave him exactly what he asked for without editorialization. If FNNoonan is being punished for being a "troll" then I must register by disagreement with this frankly unfair decision. [[User:JWeatherman|JWeatherman]]
:This is absurd. Karajou plainly started an argument out of nowhere, accusing FNNoonan of things that he had never said. As I was reading this argument, I was struck by how rude, thankless and spiteful Karajou was being to someone who gave him exactly what he asked for without editorialization. If FNNoonan is being punished for being a "troll" then I must register by disagreement with this frankly unfair decision. [[User:JWeatherman|JWeatherman]]
::No, JWeatherman, I did not start an argument out of nowhere; I responded to a troll who chose to not read exactly what Rush said; he chose to twist four words into a mantra like the MSM has been doing. And no, he did not give me what I asked for, and his admission that he never read it (nor did he intend to) proved my point. So don't continue his little game. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:38, 29 March 2009 (EDT)
::No, JWeatherman, I did not start an argument out of nowhere; I responded to a troll who chose to not read exactly what Rush said; he chose to twist four words into a mantra like the MSM has been doing. And no, he did not give me what I asked for, and his admission that he never read it (nor did he intend to) proved my point. So don't continue his little game. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:38, 29 March 2009 (EDT)
:::Noonan provided a brief comment that gave you both "exactly what Rush said" and a link to what he said. He did not make any judgment calls, he simply provided the data in a brief comment, likely because he didn't feel he needed to paraphrase Rush's argument when the argument was right there for anyone to verify. I do not know whether or not he is being punished for this, but if he is then it is unjust. Would a liberal troll give the source before quoting the exact words Rush said? If he were a troll, then he is the least effective, most honest one I have ever seen. [[User:JWeatherman|JWeatherman]]
== '''From Sean Hannity's interview with Rush Limbaugh, 22 January, 2009:'''[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,481484,00.html] ==
== '''From Sean Hannity's interview with Rush Limbaugh, 22 January, 2009:'''[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,481484,00.html] ==