4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 248:
Line 248: + +
→[[User:Tmtoulouse]] blocked?
It's reasonable to expect a sysop to spend a few minutes' time on an action as serious as this, and it should be explained publicly and openly to the community. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:04, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
It's reasonable to expect a sysop to spend a few minutes' time on an action as serious as this, and it should be explained publicly and openly to the community. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:04, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
P. S. I don't know what the details are, but there is a distinction between "tenacious point-of-view warring" and "vandalism." Point-of-view warring is continually inserting a personal point-of-view into an article after it has been shown that there is a clear community consensus against it. That's not vandalism. Vandalism is inserting vulgarities, crude remarks attacking Conservapedia, deliberately changing accurate facts to inaccurate ones, inserting parodies that caricature conservative points of view, moving articles to inappropriate new names, etc. I don't ''think'' Tmtoulouse has done that or encouraged anyone else to do that. If he has, you should provide diffs illustrating the behavior. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:11, 25 March 2007 (EDT)