142
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 391:
Line 391: +
→Initialism
Thanks for sorting that out, I couldn't be bothered :) Though I still think the original article should be deleted rather than a redirect, because a redirect makes it look like it's a legitimate alternative. So I've put the speedy delete template back, and fixed the two articles that had links to "abbreviationism". --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 11:01, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for sorting that out, I couldn't be bothered :) Though I still think the original article should be deleted rather than a redirect, because a redirect makes it look like it's a legitimate alternative. So I've put the speedy delete template back, and fixed the two articles that had links to "abbreviationism". --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 11:01, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
*Good. Thanks. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:02, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
*Good. Thanks. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:02, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
**Ah, sorry, I hadn't read you comment on the abbreviationism talk page where you had just said exactly the same thing! --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 11:06, 25 March 2007 (EDT)